NAICS 315

Apparel Manufacturing

NAICS 315: Apparel manufacturing — domestic cut-and-sew, military textiles, and nearshore production trends.

Industry at a Glance

Sector-wide aggregates across all businesses classified under NAICS 315 (2017 classification frame). For specific sub-industries within this sector, see the individual reports below.

Employment
63K
US Census CBP · 2023 · NAICS 2017
Establishments
4,337
US Census CBP · 2023 · NAICS 2017
Annual Payroll
$2.6B
US Census CBP · 2023 · NAICS 2017
Avg Annual Wage
$41,181
Derived from US Census CBP · 2023 · NAICS 2017
Market Size
$9.9B
US Census Economic Census · 2022 · NAICS 2017

Industry Overview

Apparel manufacturing (NAICS 315) covers the production of clothing and accessories through cut-and-sew operations, knitting mills, and finishing processes like pleating and embroidery. Domestic production has contracted sharply since the early 2000s as the phase-out of the Multi Fibre Arrangement shifted volume to Vietnam, Bangladesh, and China. What remains in the U.S. is structurally different from the mass-production model that preceded it — concentrated in Los Angeles (the largest domestic apparel manufacturing cluster), New York City's Garment District, and smaller hubs in North Carolina and Georgia.

Hanesbrands and PVH Corp. maintain some domestic operations, but the bulk of U.S.-based manufacturing today serves three niches: fast-replenishment programs where proximity to retailers cuts lead times from weeks to days, technical and performance apparel requiring proprietary fabrication (military uniforms under Berry Amendment domestic sourcing requirements, flame-resistant workwear), and premium brands that use "Made in USA" as a positioning tool. Contract manufacturers in Los Angeles run cut-and-sew operations for hundreds of brands, operating on thin margins with workforces subject to Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division enforcement actions that have made compliance a persistent industry issue.

The USMCA trade agreement (replacing NAFTA) maintains yarn-forward rules of origin that incentivize Western Hemisphere sourcing, benefiting producers in the U.S., Mexico, Honduras, and the Dominican Republic for duty-free access. Section 301 tariffs on Chinese goods and shifting brand strategies around supply chain resilience have modestly improved the competitive position of domestic and nearshore production since 2018, though the U.S. still imports the vast majority of apparel consumed domestically.

Who Uses These Reports

Trusted by professionals who need verified federal data to make decisions

Investors & PE Firms

Size markets, validate deal theses, and benchmark targets with verified federal data before committing capital

Consultants & Advisors

Deliver data-backed recommendations to clients with sourced and cited industry metrics — Census, BLS, and FRED

Founders & Operators

Validate market entry, benchmark against industry averages, and present credible data to investors and boards

Corporate Strategy Teams

Support expansion planning, M&A due diligence, and executive reporting with NAICS-classified industry data

See what's inside a report

Market sizing, workforce analysis, competitive landscape, regulatory environment — all sourced from Census, BLS, FRED, and SEC EDGAR.

Industry Trends

$2B

Berry Amendment compliance requirements are sustaining domestic production of military uniforms, body armor carriers, and technical textiles — a protected segment worth over $2 billion annually that cannot be sourced offshore.

USMCA

USMCA yarn-forward rules of origin are incentivizing Western Hemisphere supply chains, with brands shifting sourcing from Asia to Mexico, Honduras, and domestic cut-and-sew operations to maintain duty-free access.

03

Department of Labor enforcement of Fair Labor Standards Act wage and hour rules in Los Angeles garment factories has intensified, with the Garment Worker Protection Act (California SB 62) eliminating piece-rate pay and imposing brand liability for contractor violations.

04

3D knitting machines from Shima Seiki and Stoll are enabling single-piece garment production that eliminates cutting waste and reduces labor steps, adopted by performance brands for seamless athletic and technical apparel.

05

Direct-to-consumer brands are using domestic manufacturing for rapid small-batch production, treating short lead times and inventory flexibility as competitive advantages over offshore sourcing with 90-day order cycles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is NAICS 315? ▾
NAICS 315 classifies establishments that manufacture apparel from purchased fabric and other materials through cut-and-sew operations, knitting, and finishing. It is distinct from textile mills (NAICS 313) that produce the fabric itself. The subsector includes everything from T-shirt production to technical outerwear, though U.S. operations increasingly concentrate on specialty, military, and fast-replenishment segments rather than commodity basics.
Why is Los Angeles the largest domestic apparel manufacturing hub? ▾
Los Angeles County hosts the densest cluster of cut-and-sew contractors in the U.S., concentrated in the neighborhoods around downtown LA. The cluster persists because of proximity to brand headquarters and design studios, access to a large immigrant workforce with sewing skills, and the ability to offer fast-turn production for trend-driven and direct-to-consumer brands. The ecosystem includes fabric suppliers, trim houses, pattern makers, and finishing operations within a tight geographic radius.
What is the Berry Amendment and how does it affect apparel manufacturing? ▾
The Berry Amendment is a federal procurement law requiring the Department of Defense to purchase clothing, textiles, and other items from domestic sources unless a waiver is granted. This effectively reserves military uniform and textile contracts for U.S. manufacturers, supporting a stable demand base for companies like American Apparel Inc. (the military contractor, distinct from the retail brand) and Propper International that specialize in government contract apparel.
How do tariffs and trade agreements shape domestic apparel production? ▾
Section 301 tariffs imposed on Chinese goods since 2018 raised the landed cost of Chinese apparel imports. The USMCA maintains yarn-forward rules of origin that grant duty-free access to apparel produced in the U.S., Mexico, or Central American partner countries using qualifying yarn and fabric. These trade structures create incentives for Western Hemisphere production, though wage differentials still favor offshore sourcing for price-sensitive commodity categories.
What is California SB 62 and its impact on garment manufacturing? ▾
California's Garment Worker Protection Act (SB 62), effective January 2022, eliminated piece-rate pay in garment manufacturing and made brands jointly liable for wage theft by their contract manufacturers. The law specifically targets the Los Angeles garment industry where subcontracting chains had enabled below-minimum-wage compensation. It has increased compliance costs for contractors and prompted some brands to consolidate their contractor base to reduce liability exposure.

Questions about how we source industry data? See our data sources FAQ.

Don't see your industry?

We can generate a report for any NAICS-classified industry in the US. Professional PDF delivered in 48 hours.